1) The thing that stood out the most in my presentation, would have to be the fact that I was nervous. Every one noticed because I paused a lot. But maybe the topic in general, because not many people want to see dead bodies and I told them that I would like to.
2) The most challenging thing for me was, deciding what to share with every one. I did not know where to start, with all the research that we had, but I got through that. The other thing that was challenging was getting rid of being nervous, though after a bit it went away. Other than that everything was good.
3) For literal I found out about th egyptiansand how they were the irst to do the autopsies, i also new that the media showed the whole forensic field in a different way than what it really is. For inerpretive I shared abit about the tv show csi to make connections with the students and my visual interpreted one o the inicioons i talked about. I also told a story about what a friend does in the forensc field. The difference betweenthe literal and inteerpretive is that the literal means facts that you can share with others that are benificiary, it is not things you dont know or need to know. Interpretive is using some kind of visual to portray the things you know and help make connections with others.
4) I would take both the god and the bad. ex. I noticed that not many people were paying attention so next time I have to invove them a bit more. Next time i will try not to be as nervous because that would make my presentation fail. Though next time I would talk abot my visual because I did not do that. I would lso apply mooore enthusuasm for my next presentation.
No comments:
Post a Comment